A U.S. Senate roundtable discussion, hosted by Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.), tackled a taboo topic that has long been shrouded in controversy and ignored by mainstream media: why public health agencies have not studied the health outcomes of vaccinated versus unvaccinated children — and why they have refused to make data on the topic available to the public.
The discussion opened a Pandora’s box of questions, fears, and revelations that have left many parents and independent scientists demanding answers. Brian Hooker, chief scientific officer for Children’s Health Defense, was unequivocal in his critique. “They do not publish the results [or] let any independent scientist in to look at that information,” he said. “They refuse to publish the results and they really know why. It’s because the bloated vaccination schedule is responsible and is, I would say, in part responsible for the epidemic of chronic disorders that we see in children in the U.S.”
The implications of Hooker’s statements are profound. In 1962, children received just five vaccine doses. Fast forward to 2023, and children up to age 18 are now subjected to 73 doses of 16 different vaccines. This dramatic increase in vaccine exposure has occurred without comprehensive, independent studies on the long-term health effects. Why is this critical data being withheld? What are the public health agencies afraid of uncovering?
Del Bigtree, CEO of the Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN), provided a stark comparison to highlight the issue. “In the 1980s, when we were giving 11 doses of about three vaccines, the chronic illness rate, which includes neurological and autoimmune disease, was 12.8%. Once we passed the 1986 [National Childhood Vaccine Injury] Act and we had the gold rush of vaccines explode … the chronic illness rate, neurological and autoimmune disease, skyrocket[ed] to 54%,” he stated. This data from 2011 to 2012 suggests an alarming trend that might have worsened today. “We have no idea since then how bad this has gotten. But what you were looking at right there is the greatest decline in public health in human history,” Bigtree added.
The picture painted by these statistics is grim. Chronic illnesses, once relatively rare, are now a common part of childhood. Neurological and autoimmune diseases have surged, with many pointing to the exponential increase in vaccines as a potential culprit. Yet, the refusal of public health agencies to release data or conduct thorough investigations into these correlations raises serious questions about their transparency and accountability.
Why is there a persistent resistance to investigating the health outcomes of vaccinated versus unvaccinated children? The public deserves to know if the vaccines intended to protect children might also be contributing to a rise in chronic health issues. The silence and secrecy from health agencies only fuel suspicions and erode public trust.
The roundtable discussion underscored a critical need for independent, transparent research into the long-term effects of the current childhood vaccination schedule. The health and future of generations depend on it. It’s not just about the number of vaccines, but the cumulative effect of multiple doses administered over a child’s developmental years. Are we compromising our children’s health in the name of disease prevention?
The potential for conflict of interest within public health agencies cannot be overlooked. The pharmaceutical industry wields significant influence, both financially and politically. Could it be that these agencies are prioritizing industry profits over public health? If so, this represents a betrayal of public trust on an unprecedented scale.
Sen. Ron Johnson’s willingness to broach this controversial subject is a step towards accountability and transparency. But it is just the beginning. The fight for the truth about vaccines and their impact on child health must continue with vigor and resolve. Parents, scientists, and concerned citizens must unite to demand comprehensive, unbiased research and the release of all pertinent data.
The greatest challenge lies in breaking the stronghold of established narratives and questioning long-held assumptions. This requires courage, persistence, and an unwavering commitment to uncovering the truth. The health and future of our children depend on it.
In a world where chronic illnesses in children are becoming the norm rather than the exception, it is imperative to ask the hard questions and demand honest answers. The dramatic increase in vaccines administered to children should not go unquestioned, especially when there is a concurrent rise in health issues that were once rare. The stakes are too high to allow silence and secrecy to prevail.
As we move forward, let this roundtable discussion serve as a catalyst for change. Let it inspire more voices to join the call for transparency and accountability in public health. For the sake of our children and future generations, we must insist on thorough, independent investigations into the health outcomes of vaccinated versus unvaccinated children. Only then can we hope to truly understand the impact of our current vaccination practices and ensure that they are indeed safeguarding, not compromising, the health of our youth.
